Sarah Van Emst vs Madelief Hageman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Hageman has won 38.85% of their second serve points recently, slightly trailing Emst's 40.46%. Is this a significant factor? Yes, it's closely linked with match prediction accuracy.
• Return Game Stats: Hageman has impressed by winning 49.12% of second serve return points, but Emst leads with 52.47%. On first serve returns, however, Hageman is stronger at 37.89% compared to Emst's 33.33%.
• Pressure Handling: Hageman saves breakpoints 47.42% of the time, narrowly outperforming Emst's 46.13%. Could this influence tight situations in the match? Absolutely.
• Overall Performance: Hageman's win rate is 50.85% over the last year, while Emst boasts a higher 65.45% win rate. Could this indicate overall edge to Emst? Certainly.
• Surface Strengths: Hageman excels on clay with a 52% win rate, whereas Emst is strongest on hard courts with an impressive 71% success rate. How does this factor into the upcoming match? Consider the current surface.
• Event Level: Hageman has a win rate of 47.92% in ITF $10K tournaments, whereas Emst is more successful, winning 66.67% of matches at the same level.
• Direct H2H Matches: Emst has won all their previous encounters, leading 1-0 in matches and 2-0 in sets. This historical dominance could be telling.
• Deciding Set Performance: If it goes to the wire, Hageman has a 45% winning rate in deciding sets, better than Emst's 33% over the past year.
• Break Point Conversion: Hageman converts 43.09% of breakpoints recently, slightly better than Emst's 41.11%. Could this be crucial? Yes, especially for in-game decisions.

Editorial Prediction (September 4, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match pits Hageman against Emst in what promises to be a compelling contest. Recent performance patterns reveal both players possess unique strengths and weaknesses.

Emst edges ahead in overall match performance and second serve statistics, factors that could provide a competitive edge. However, Hageman's proficiency at first serve returns and breakpoint conversions might counterbalance those.

Historically, Emst has maintained dominance in their head-to-head meetings and appears more consistent at this level. Nonetheless, Hageman's advantage in deciding sets might be pivotal if the match extends to the wire.

After analyzing the statistics and historical data, Emst is anticipated to prevail in this clash, given their strong win rate and past successes against Hageman.